Summary heading
Descriptive Note
Function and purpose
This series consists of Cabinet Submissions received in
Cabinet Office during the terms of the Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Fraser Ministries
– that is, between 23 December 1975 and 4 February 1983
Following the Coalition’s election victory on 13 December
1975, the caretaker government that had been appointed on 11 November 1975 (the
First Fraser Ministry) was dissolved and a new ministry (the Second Fraser
Ministry) was sworn in on 22 December 1975
In the Cabinet Office, the sequence of Cabinet Submission
numbers which had controlled submissions received during the term of the
caretaker government, was terminated and the first submission received the day
after the new ministry was formed was registered as Submission No 1
This new sequence of control numbers for submissions was
continued throughout the term of all the succeeding Fraser ministries ending
only with the defeat of the Fraser government in the election of 5 March
1983. The last submission received in
Cabinet Office in this time was no 5974 received and registered on 4 February
1983
Ministry Date range Reason for end Range of submissions
of ministry of
ministry received
during the ministry
Second
Fraser: 22/12/75 – 20/12/77
Election on 10 Dec 1977 1 – 1848
Third
Fraser 20/12/77 –
3/11/80 Election on 18 Oct 1980 1849 – 4403
Fourth
Fraser 3/11/80 – 7/5/82 Cabinet re-shuffle 4404 – 5479
7
May 1982
Fifth
Fraser 7 /5/82 –
11/3/83 Election on 5 Mar 1983 5480 - 5974
One copy of each
submission received throughout these years was filed in a sequence of folders,
which constitute this series. (The department was required to provide 60 copies
of each submission.) The series
ultimately consisted of 270 folders - a
large accumulation. One of the themes
running through the Cabinet Office’s correspondence on the operation of the
system itself is the concern at the great increase in the volume of Cabinet
business that occurred in the early years of the Fraser government – by 1979 it
was assessed as a three-fold expansion on the business of the previous
Coalition government. (See Note for series A10756)
During the term of the Second Fraser ministry the various
instructions relating to the preparation, control and management of submissions
was codified and published as a guide – titled the Cabinet Handbook – which was
first issued in February 1976. (Note 1) The Cabinet
Handbook provides guidance on what matters should be submitted to Cabinet and
on the drafting and form of the Submission. The range of matters which might be
submitted included:
- Major
policy issues
- Proposals
involving large expenditure
- Proposals
requiring new legislation or amendment of existing legislation
- Senior
appointments
Consequently the Submissions in this series document the
information, opinion and advice on which the government based major decisions
in the national governance at this time.
The development of policy and procedures regarding
Submissions is documented in file LC179 parts 1 to 3
Submissions were rarely received in Cabinet Office
unheralded. Because of the difficulty
in programming meetings to ensure ministers attendance (in competition with
their other duties), a practice was developed of forecasting submissions. Each minister was required to supply a
monthly summary of pending matters in relation to which a submission was likely
to be made – initially looking six months ahead – later three months
ahead. The Cabinet Office developed a
program of meetings – and Business Lists for each meeting [Note 2] - and
circulated these to Ministers well in advance in anticipation of the scheduled
Submissions being received. (The file
in the LC series was created when the matter appeared in the forecasts – so the
actual receipt and circulation of the submission might be closer to the end
point than the starting point of the activities documented on the file.
When the Submission was received in Cabinet Office it was
checked for compliance with the Handbook.
(Checklists documenting this process are on file LC1057 Part 1-10) One of the requirements that received close
attention was that where a submission involved the interests of more than one
department (very often the case) then the appropriate consultation must have
taken place during the formulation of the submission – the submission must not
contain any disputation of fact. The
Minster’s signature on the submission was held to be a certification that the
required consultation had occurred – and also that the Minister endorsed the
substance of the submission. (As the
submission was developed in the department, there was a view that it reflected
Departmental opinion which might not entirely coincide with the personal
opinion of the Minister.) The outcome
of the consultation was expressed in the recommendation – an essential element
of the Submission – which should be couched in terms that anticipated the
wording of the Decision.
The Handbook required that the Submission must be received
in Cabinet Office not later than 10 days ahead of the scheduled meeting at
which it was to be considered. There
was much pressure to get submissions in on time which allowed circulation to
all Ministers so that they were in a position to debate the issue if necessary
– and to obtain input from their department if required. (Submissions were not circulated to
Departments – it was at the discretion of the Minister to acquaint his
departmental head of the matter if he chose.)
Papers and Memoranda
During the term of the Fraser government two new categories
of Cabinet documents were introduced which approximated Submissions. It had been established practice for many
years that Ministers might, with the prior consent of the Prime Minister,
introduce at a meeting a meeter in relation to which no formal submission had
been made. These were termed ‘under the
line’ matters and resulted n a Decision Without Submission. (This practice had its uses – proposed
senior appointments were always Without Submission – to side-step the mandatory
pre-meeting circulation.) However,
Ministers frequently produced a variety of documents at the meeting to support
an ‘under the line’ proposal or to provide general background information. In September 1976 the Cabinet Office decided
that as these documents influenced Decisions, they should be identified,
controlled and copies retained. This
procedure was implemented on 23 September 1976 and the registered documents were
called Cabinet Papers (see CRS A12933).
At the end of 19878, in the course of the Review of Cabinet
Arrangements, an attempt was made to limit the volume of such material and from
February 1979 Cabinet Papers were replaced by Cabinet Memoranda (see CRS A12930),
the distinction being that Memoranda should be presented only at the request of
Cabinet (expressed in a Decision) –
that is, they would supplement an earlier Submission. Because Memoranda could be anticipated, like Submissions, the
same requirements that applied to Submissions were gradually applied to
Memoranda so that in time the distinction between an initial Submission and
subsequent supporting Memoranda became less apparent. The concepts of Papers and Memoranda were also applied in the
business of the Cabinet Committees.
A Submission to Cabinet may be referred, at the discretion
of the Prime Minister, to a Cabinet Committee for consideration rather than to
the Cabinet itself. There were no
Cabinet Committees during the brief term of the First Fraser (Caretaker)
Ministry however a range of Standing Committees was established in the Second
Ministry in accordance with established practice. (Note 3)
In some cases the Committee having discussed the matter may
then refer a recommendation to a meeting of Cabinet for a Decision. In other cases the Committee itself made the
Decision. The Decision number in
respect of any submission, indicates where the Decision was made. A Decision made by Cabinet has no alpha
suffix to the Decision number. A
Decision made in a Cabinet Committee has an alpha suffix which indicates which
committee. Generally Decisions made in
any Ad Hoc committee all have the same suffix (‘AD HOC”) except for Decisions
of the Budget Committee which was, in effect, a recurring Ad Hoc committee –
its Decisions have a ‘B” suffix (sometimes shown as ‘AHB’):
AD HOC – a generic abbreviation
for any Ad Hoc Committee
B – Ad Hoc Committee on Budget
C – Coordination Committee
(1979-1983)
EC – Economic committee (1975-1983)
FAD – Foreign Affairs and Defence
Committee (1975-1983)
GA – General Administrative
Committee (1975-1979)
GP – General Policy Committee
(1979-1983)
IP – Industry Policy Committee
(1979-1983)
IS - Intelligence and Security
Committee (1977-1980)
LEG – Legislative Committee
(1975-1983)
MOG – Machinery of Government
committee (1975-1979)
MP – Monetary Policy Committee
(1977-1983)
PC – Planning and Coordination
Committee (1975-1979)
PIC – Public Information
Committee (1977-1983)
WP – Wages Policy committee
(1977-1983)
SWP – Social Welfare Policy
Committee (1977-1983)
The Whitlam government had adopted the practice of including
the entire ministry in the Cabinet and this practice was effectively continued
in the caretaker Fraser government. (The First Fraser ministry consisted of
only 15 members, most holding multiple ministerial portfolios.) However with the formation of the second
ministry – which consisted initially of 27 members – the former practice, which
had been in place since the 1950’s, was restored and the Second Fraser Cabinet
consisted of only 12 ministers (13 ministries, PR Lynch being both Treasurer
and Minister for Finance.) Note that
the Record of Attendance (A12575) shows what ministers attended each meeting –
including co-opted ministers. (Note 4)
However the Fraser government revived the concept of
Ministerial meetings where Decisions made were registered and controlled in the sequence of Cabinet Decisions – and
were distinguished by addition of an ‘M’ suffix (sometimes shown in the
Decision register as ‘MIN’). The first Decisions of the Second Fraser
government were Ministerial decisions (made at a meeting of the full ministry
on 23 December 1975.) Each subsequent
ministry was normally inaugurated with a ministerial meeting of this kind and a
short sequence of ministerial Decisions – hardly more than a re-iteration of
the previous set of Ministerial Decisions..
These were all confined to housekeeping and procedural matters, mostly
concerning specifically the operation of the Cabinet system, and procedures of
the Cabinet office (control and circulation of
submissions etc.) (Prominent
among them was a statement that Cabinet meetings had absolute claim on a
Minister’s time.)
A senior officer of the Cabinet Office attends the Cabinet meetings to take notes
of the discussion and the decisions made.
Immediately after the conclusion of the meeting the formal Decisions (or
‘Minutes’ as they are referred to) are written up from these notes, typed up
and registered in the Cabinet Office and distributed to
Ministers and departments for action as required. (The notebooks created by the Notetakers are described in
RecordSearch as CRS A11099) In the
Fraser government an additional facilitative record was introduced from 1976
called ’Debrief sheets’ – see CRS A12937)
Related legislation
Using the series
As all submissions have been entered in RecordSearch
database, a submission relating to any particular subject can be retrieved by
keyword search in RecordSearch (limiting search by Series No 12908.) An alternative is to peruse the Register of
Submissions (CRS A12910) A submission
was normally, by direction of the Cabinet Office, a fairly brief document (the stated maximum being 7 pages.) More
background material may be found on the relevant file in the Cabinet Office’s
LC series (CRS A10756) The department
which prepared the submission will also have files on the subject, including
the drafting of the submission, in its general correspondence files
series. (The Cover Sheet on top of each
submission indicates which Minister - and hence which department - is
making the submission.)
The entry for the LC file in RecordSearch shows the relevant
Submission number in the Title field.
Note that there is no correlation between a Submission
number and the Decision number for that submission. The sequence of Submission numbers reflects the chronology of the
submissions’ being received in Cabinet Office.
The sequence of Decision numbers reflects the chronology of the
submissions’ being presented to a cabinet meeting for consideration - and there
are many variable factors that intervene to affect the latter. In addition, the sequence of Decision
numbers includes Decisions on matters for which no submission was made (known
as ‘Decisions without Submissions’) The
Decision number is therefore normally well in advance (in numerical terms) of
the Submission number. In the course of
the Second to Fifth Fraser ministries, there were 5974 Submission and 19675
Decisions.
The Register of Decisions (CRS A12911) shows the relevant LC
file for each Decision (that is, including Decisions without Submissions)
Language of material
Physical characteristics
The practice of the Cabinet Office is that a copy of each
finalised submission received, together with a coy of the relevant subsequent
Decision in each case, is filed in a sequence of visidex folders arranged by
the Submission number. When this
series ended it consisted of 270 folders.
Since transfer to the custody of the National Archives, both
for preservation reasons and to improve accessibility, the Submissions have
been removed from the folders and individually re-packaged in acid free
folders. The Submission are controlled
and described at this level in the RecordSearch database.
The Submissions are created by various Departments but to a
standardised format as specified in the Cabinet Handbook. The maximum is 7 pages and the top-most
page is a Cover Sheet which shows the Submission Number and Copy Number, the
title of the Submission, the Minster - or Ministers if it is a joint
Submission, and summary information as follows:
Main purpose; Relation to existing policy;
Timing/legislative priority; Announcement of decision, Tabling, etc; Action required
before announcement; and Cost.
The Submission concludes with a Recommendation and is signed
and dated by the responsible Minister or Ministers.
There may be attachments to the submission, such as reports,
which can be quite large (though the Handbook required they should be limited
in size.)
System of arrangement and control
The items of this series are controlled by the
Submission Number allocated from the Submission Register (CRS A12910) and
therefore reflecting the chronology of the Submission’s being received in the
Cabinet Office. The Submission number
sequence is a simple number sequence ranging from 1 to 5914.
Note that many numbers are missing from the Submissions that
are now present in this series. For example
for Submission lodged in 1976 a total of 95 numbers are missing. Reference to the Register will explain why
a number is missing in each case – annotations in the register show ’Number not
used’ or ‘withdrawn’ – sometimes with an indication that the Submission was
replaced by a later Submission.
Relationships with other records
The submission numbers are allocated from the
Submission register (CRS A12910) which
documents the receipt in Cabinet Office of all submissions made during the
Second to Fifth Fraser ministries. A
copy of the relevant Decision or Decisions is filed with each Submission The relevant file in the LC series (CRS
A10756) documents the process of preparation of the submission for presentation
to the cabinet. The Decision register
(CRS A 12911) controls the allocation
of Decision number to register all Decisions made in that ministry, including
Decisions Without Submissions. The
Decisions themselves (normally one page for each Decision) are accumulated in
A13075. The Attendance Sheets (CRS
A12575) record which ministers were present
at each meeting (as well as the type of meeting – whether cabinet or a
committee – and also who the Notetakers were at each meeting.)
Finding aids
This series and related series of the First Fraser
Ministry are described in RecordSearch database both at Series level and item
level. For general information
regarding the Cabinet office refer to registration for agency CA 1472 in
RecordSearch. The Cabinet Office
procedures regarding preparation of
Submissions is described in detail in the Cabinet Handbook which was
first printed during the term of the second Fraser Ministry (February in
1976.) The Handbook also outlines the
operation of the Cabinet system in broad terms. The present edition (the fifth) can be seen at www.pmc.gov.au/guidelines/index.cfm
Note that Cabinet Decisions are referred to in the Handbook,
and in some other contexts, as Cabinet Minutes. Matters that are raised in the Cabinet meeting for which no
submission has been made (leading to a Decision without Submission) are
referred to as ‘under–the-line’ matters.
Access conditions
Series history
Provenance
The records that constitute this series were created
in the various government departments and registered as record items of this
series in Cabinet Office (CA1472) between December 1975 and March 1983.
Immediate source of acquisition
Custodial history
The records that constitute this series were
transferred from the Cabinet Office to the custody of the National Archives in
May 2004
Quantity in agency custody
Disposal history
Publication note
Additional information
End notes
Note 1.
Cabinet Handbook
There appears to be some difference of opinion on this
point. Most references to the 1976
Handbook are quite sure it was the first.
For example:
- the
Cabinet Decision noting the implementation of the Handbook in 1976 states:
Minster noted that a Cabinet Handbook, the first to be produced, is now
being printed and would be distributed to Ministers early next week. The guidelines, to be followed by all
Ministers, should streamline the operation of the Cabinet system and be
particularly helpful for new ministers.( Decision No 230 (M) 10 Feb 1976)
- and in his preamble to the
Recommendations in his Report on the Review of Cabinet Arrangements (17
November 1978) Secretary Yeend includes ‘the publication of a Cabinet
Handbook’ among the list of ‘recently introduced procedures’ contributing
to ‘the most substantial changes in Cabinet procedures and support [in the
last three years] than at any time since 1950’
However a minute
by B V Cogan Assist Sec, Cabinet Branch dated 26 March 1979 refers to a 1972/73 version – as well as a
much earlier precursor:
‘The Secretary called me in this morning and showed me a
copy of a Cabinet Handbook which Mr Gullick had brought to his attention. The Handbook was a 1950 version although I
am not exactly sure as to the extent of any circulation then. This was the first time that I had been
aware that there had been a Cabinet Handbook prior to the version developed in
1972 and issued in 1973… The 1950 Handbook was a much simpler version that the
current one.’ (File LC2198 Part 4)
Note 2: Business Lists
There is no discrete series of Business lists for the Fraser
government. File LC12 (parts 1 to 7) in
A10756) contain Business Lists for meetings up to October 1976 (as well as
correspondence about the preparation of the lists, note to PM regarding items
listed, etc
Note 3: Cabinet
Committees during the Fraser government
No
Cabinet Committees were created in the course of the first Fraser
ministry. At the first meeting of the
second Fraser Ministry on 22 December 1975 the following Standing Cabinet
committees were created (by Decision No 9)
- Policy
and Planning Committee (PP)
- General
Administrative Committee (GA)
- Legislative
Committee (LEG)
- Economic
Committee (EC)
·
Foreign
Affairs and Defence Committee (FAD)
- Machinery
of Government Committee (MOG)
The Policy and Planning Committee was re-named Planning and
Coordination (PC) but by October 1976 it had never met and in late 1977 it was
again commented that it had ‘hardly any use’
In February it was replaced by a new committee initially proposed as a ‘Leadership’ committee but
this name was changed to Coordination Committee (CC)
By the end of 1977 the following committees had also been
added
- Intelligence
and Security (IS)
- Monetary
Policy (MP)
- Wages
Policy (WP)
- Social
Welfare Policy (SWP)
In Feb 1979 the General Administration (GA) committee and
the MOG committee were replaced and their functions re-distributed in two new
committees called Industry Policy Committee and General Policy Committee
In late 1980 the IS committee was subsumed into FAD
Committee
The Chronological Record of Meetings (CRS A12573) shows what
Cabinet Committee Meetings occurred The
Attendance Sheets (CRS A12575) records what Ministers attended each meeting. (The Attendance Sheets in the later period
have pre-printed on the reverse of the form a list of the membership of each
current committee.)
The committee system was intended to relieve pressure on the
Prime Minister - The three most important committees were Planing and
Coordination, Economic Committee and FAD – and these (inter alia) were chaired by the Prime minister. Others were chaired by Senior ministers. One
of the uses of the committee system was to involve ministers who were not
cabinet members in decisions of government and the cooperative/collective
responsibility ethos. [SMH article of
23 Jan 1976 (file LC2 part 1) makes the point that Cabinet Committees are more
correctly called Ministerial Committees since they include Ministers who are not
members of Cabinet.]
The expectation (as set out in Decision 9 of 22 Dec 1975)
was that in general the Standing Committees will take final decision on matters
referred to them. In practice, partly
because of the management style of the Prime Minister, Committees which he did
not chair were less likely to make final decisions.
Ad Hoc committees were created from time to time to deal
with particular non-ongoing issues. For
example at the end of 1978 the following AD Hoc committees were current:
Uranium Committee
Taxation Committee
Antarctic Policy Committee
New Parliament House Committee
Industrial Relations Committee
AD Hoc Committees normally did not make final Decisions
unless it was clear that the matter had been referred to them for that purpose.
Supporting the Cabinet Committees was a further level of
committees which were called ‘Officials Committees’ – name changed in February
1979 to ‘Permanent Heads Committees’
These were composed of departmental heads and were intended to
facilitate consultation at departmental level. The membership of any Permanent Heads committee did not
necessarily reflect the Ministerial composition of the Cabinet Committee which
it supported. Permanent Heads
Committees did not make Decisions.
The terms of reference of the Standing Committees as at 5
February 1979 were defined as follows:
Coordination Committee (CC) : To consider overall
government strategy and to deal with matters refereed to it by the Prime
Minister
Foreign Affairs and Defence (FAD) : To consider matters concerned with
international relations and defence
Intelligence and Security (IS) : To set overall policy and oversee the work
of the intelligence community
Monetary Policy
(MP) : To deal with matters
relating to interest rates, banking policy and currency exchange rates
Wages Policy (WP)
: To settle the Governments Submission
at the National Wage Case and deal with related matters referred to it by the
Prime Minister or Cabinet.
Social Welfare Policy
(SWP) : To oversee and consider
plans and policies and review existing policies and programs in the broad field
of health, welfare and education
Legislation (LEG) :
To examine draft bills, and ensure their compliance with the terms of
Decision of Cabinet or Cabinet Committees. To consider minor legislative proposals determine priority and
authorise drafting. To develop and
monitor the legislation program for each Parliamentary sittings, including oversight
of priorities for drafting and passage.
To oversee the Parliamentary proceedings and priorities.
General
Policy (GP) : To consider matters broadly within existing
policy guidelines, as referred by the Prime Minister. To deal with organisational and administrative matters
Industry Policy
(IP) : To consider matters arising from reports of
the Industries Assistance Commission and the Temporary Assistance Authority. To
oversee Government Purchasing policy, including the acquisition of ADP
capability. To deal with matters
affecting Australian industry generally
Note 4 Coopted
Ministers
A minister who was not a Cabinet member might be coopted to
a meeting if the subject matter impacted significantly on his portfolio. That is, he/she was advised by Cabinet
Office of the Submission and the forthcoming meeting and was required to
attend. (If the matter was Without
Submission the minister could attend if he/she chose.) As there was no set order in which matters
listed were dealt with, a Co-opted minister normally attended the whole meeting
and might be invited to comment on other matters apart from the one in relation
to which he/she had been coopted. The
same arrangements applied to Cabinet Committee meetings.
Sources