Series details


New search Refine search

first previous next last Displaying 1 of 1


Series details for: A11661
Series number
A11661
Title
Papers relating to the legal case of Henry R Merton Company Limited versus William Morris Hughes
Accumulation dates
1918 - 1922
Contents dates
1887 - 1922
Items in this series on RecordSearch
81

Click to see items listed on RecordSearch. Please contact the National Reference Service if you can't find the record you want as not all items from the series may be on RecordSearch.
Agency/person recording
  • 01 Jan 1918 - 31 Dec 1922
    CA 5, Attorney-General's Department, Central Office
Agency/person controlling
  • 16 Mar 1949 -
    CA 1297, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, Central Office
Quantity and location
  • 0.9 metres held in ACT
System of arrangement/ control
None apparent: single number system imposed by Archives May 2000
Range of control symbols
1 PART A - 60 PART B
Predominant physical format
PAPER FILES AND DOCUMENTS
Series note

Function and purpose

On August 3 1918 H.R. Merton and Company Limited, metal merchants and brokers of London, issued a writ against the Australian Prime Minister William Morris Hughes. Hughes, according to the writ issued, had alleged that Merton's were enemy traders, of German origin and character, a branch of the German company Metalgesellschaft, disloyal and dangerous to Great Britain and had behaved treacherously to the British Government. Merton's sought damages and an injunction to stop Hughes making further defamatory statements. Merton's contended in the writ that Hughes' statements had led to their application for a licence to trade under the Non-Ferrous Metals Industry Act of 1918 to be refused. This refusal of a licence had forced Merton's in October 1918 into voluntary liquidation. Further writs were issued in October 1918 and December 1918 following what Merton's contended were Hughes' defamatory statements. In June 1919 the plantiff's gave notice to trial. In October 1919 Hughes' solicitors successfully had the trial postponed on the grounds that documents provided by the plantiffs still needed to be inspected and the difficulty of Hughes being present at the trial. In March 1920 proceedings were stayed with Hughes' counsel stating that his allegations did not refer to any individual associated with the company but rather the company itself. No damages, costs or injunctions were awarded, each party paying their own costs. The case had cost the Commonwealth 6500 pounds Sterling.

Following the issuing of the writ solicitors Coward & Hawkesley Sons & Chance of London were instructed to act for Hughes. The Attorney-General's Department and the departmental head, Sir Robert Garran, Solicitor-General, also took up the defence. The defence team then gathered documents supporting Hughes' statements from many sources: the Procurator-General in London, the Customs Department, the United States of America, the British Foreign Office and the Attorney-General's Department. Many of these supporting documents originated with the Enemy Trading Acts that were introduced at the beginning of World War I.

It is these supporting documents gathered by Hughes' defence team that form the majority of the papers collected in this series. The other papers in the series are directly related to the legal proceedings.

Using the series

System of arrangement and control

The papers in this series were originally arranged into a group of 14 series A479-A493. However as the purpose for such an arrangement was not evident it was decided to rearrange the 14 series into one main series with an imposed single number control system.

The papers in the series have been divided into two categories:

I - consisting of items 1 to 8 which are directly related to the legal proceedings

and

II - consisting of items 9 to 60 which are the supporting documents gathered by the Hughes defence team. Within category II the following sub-categories apply:

items 9 to 18 are documents gathered by Hughes solicitor's Coward & Hawkesley Sons and Chance;

items 19 and 20 are original Australian Metal Company documents;

items 21 to 30 are Attorney-General's Department files;

items 31 to 38 are Attorney-General's Department files and may have been Sir Robert Garran's personal files;

items 39 to 48 are documents gathered in the United States of America;

and items 54 to 57 are copies of documents provided by the plantiff's solicitors.

Series history

At the completion of the legal proceedings, papers with Coward & Hawkesley Sons and Chance of London and the Australian High Commission London were returned to the Attorney-General's Department in Australia. In February 1927 'five parcels' of papers (see NAA: A456, W22/37 & NAA: A9084, Item 1: Page 21 entry 2918 - the relationship between these 'five parcels' and the papers returned from London is not clear) were sent by Attorney-General's to be filed with the Investigation Branch. The papers were found in 1963 in the basement of the Administrative Building (now the John Gorton building) with ASIO material.

Sources

National Archives of Australia (ACT): A456/3; W22/37.

National Archives of Australia (ACT): A11661; 8.

LF Fitzhardinge, The Little Digger 1914-1952, pp.331-333. 

Series converted from

A479; A480; A481; A482; A483; A484; A485; A486; A487; A488; A489; A490; A491; A492; A493

Related series
  •  
    A2910, Correspondence files, multiple number series (Class 400)
  •  
    A3200, Correspondence files, 'TEM' series (Trading with the Enemy - policy)
  •  
    A3201, Correspondence files, 'TE' series (Trading with the Enemy - cases)
  •  
    A367, Correspondence files, single number series with year prefix, 1916-1927, and 'C' prefix, 1927-1953
  •  
    A3934, Correspondence files, SC secret and confidential series, (old files)
  •  
    A456, Correspondence files, multiple number series with 'W' [War] prefix
  •  
    A457, Correspondence files, multiple number series, first system
  •  
    A494, Correspondence files, multiple number series
Visibility & availability indicator
  • 89 . Digital image charge: Small-Medium
Date registered
26 May 2000

Jump to record number Go
Displaying 1 of 1

New search Refine search